A Kipling character remarks somewhere that Jane Austen's only issue was Henry James! If The Age of Innocence is representative of her writing, he could could have added Edith Wharton. This is a very beautifully written book, elegant and perceptive, dealing with the troubled elites of New York in the 1870s - although Wharton was already writing with both historical and geographical perspective, living in Europe after the First World War. The main character is Newland Archer, a well off, well connected young man who becomes engaged to a quite charming girl very early in the novel. He's very fond of her indeed, but he doesn't, perhaps, quite love her with all his heart. And marriage to her is the acceptance of form over substance, of manners over feelings, and of the small town parochialism of late C19th New York, which he longs to abandon. He wants to travel and to read adventurously!
For her, marriage to Newland is all she dreams of, but the arrival of a glamorous cousin threatens her joy - not that she would be so ill-bred as to talk to him about it, or to show her feelings to anybody at all. But, as someone comments late in the novel:
You never did ask each other anything, did you? And you never told each other anything. You just sat and watched each other ... well, I back your generation for knowing more about each other's private thoughts than we ever have time to find out.
The novel spends almost its whole 300 pages watching Newland worry about what to do, follows him making his final decision (does he decide, or is he a pawn in the hands of stronger forces?), and puts him in his social context. But an important character is the city of New York, physically and morally small, unsure of itself, with an old elite and a new one, and a mix of modern and eighteenth century feelings. The elite at play in town and country, vivid physical descriptions of houses and cold weather, and rich family conversations and plottings, all provide a rich web of happenings and conflicting views which keep your interest without the slightest hitch.
It's a beautiful book, elegant and thought provoking, but one theme deserves, in the light of recent discussion over on Cornflower, a little more notice. This is a book about a woman (about a whole class of women) who do little with their lives except keep home for their husbands - who lead fiercely independent lives with little regard for modern conceptions of partnership - and to live quite, unassuming, unadventurous social lives. With time, money and freedom, they elect to do nothing. A year into marriage, Newland is beginning to be bored:
She had spent her poetry and romance on their short courting: the function was exhausted because the need was past.
I refuse to compare this book to All Passion Spent, or I shall get into trouble. But in The Age of Innocence there is a psychological richness, an elegance of writing, and a coherence of thought which lifts this novel into the realms of the very fine indeed. I recommend it to you all.