Samuel Johnson once remarked that "you could not stand five minutes beneath a shed while it rained with [Edmund Burke] without thinking him the greatest man that ever lived" - quoted variously by Boswell and Mrs Piozzi. This occurred to me this afternoon when I sought shelter under a tree in a torrential downpour by the Thames. Admittedly, I was sharing the exiguous shelter with an attractive young lady who lacked both umbrella and conversation, but the thought still came to me. Johnson is often not read nowadays directly, but only through the medium of Boswell, either the Life of Johnson or Journal of a Tour to the Hebrides. But some things of Johnson's are indeed well worth reading.
Rasselas, for example, is a striking aphoristic work, describing the philosophic travels of Rasselas, a prince of Abyssinia, and is full of common sense, striking writing and humour - and ends with a "Conclusion in Which Nothing is Concluded" - there is much to think about, but, surprisingly for those who only know Johnson from his retorts to the dim and the slow, no one view is pushed down your throat, unless it be the proposition that action is superior to reflection. Just a few lines from the story may show you what I mean:
"Marriage has many pains, but celibacy no pleasures."
"Integrity without knowledge is weak and useless, and knowledge without integrity is dangerous and dreadful."
Rasselas was published in the same year, 1759, as Voltaire's Candide, which it resembles although it is less savage in tone - but neither author had read the other's book. And he wrote stimulatingly on the Lives of the English Poets, and penned a notable introduction to the plays of Shakespeare, which set the tone for our modern view of him as the greatest and most humane and understanding of all playwrights. And the Dictionary is full of instruction, prejudice and fun: fopdoodle is an insignisicant wretch, and salmagundi is a mixture of chopped meat and pickled herrings!
And to come full circle, we should not forget Burke, subject of Johnson's pluvial encomium! The greatest orator of his age - an age blessed with wonderful speakers - he moved out of tune with modern times when he opposed the French revolution; at the end of his life, young MPs cruelly called him "the dinner bell" and crept away when he rose to speak. Admittedly, the Philosophical Enquiry Into the Origins of Our Ideas of the Sublime and the Beautiful is heavy going and just for the specialist. But On the Present Discontents is still worth reading:
"It is an undertaking of some degree of delicacy to examine into the cause of public disorders. If a man happens not to succeed in such an enquiry, he will be thought weak and visionary; if he touches the true grievance, there is a danger that he may come near to
persons of weight and consequence, who will rather be exasperated at the discovery of their errors, than thankful for the occasion of correcting them. If he should be obliged to blame the favourites of the people, he will be considered as the tool of power; if he censures those in power, he will be looked on as an instrument of faction. But in all exertions of duty something is to be hazarded."
And Reflections on the Revolution in France, a European bestseller at the time, ought to be required reading for every thinking person. Yes, its a conservative view of the world, though Burke was a Whig, but it's also a wonderfully modern liberal, parliamentary view, and written with an angel on the quill:
"It is now sixteen or seventeen years since I saw the Queen of France, then the Dauphiness, at Versailles; and surely never lighted on this orb, which she hardly seemed to touch, a more delightful vision. I saw her just above the horizon, decorating and cheering the elevated sphere she just began to move in, glittering like the morning star full of life and splendour and joy. . . . Little did I dream that I should have lived to see such disasters fallen upon her in a nation of gallant men, in a nation of men of honour and of cavaliers. I thought ten thousand swords must have leaped from their scabbards to avenge even a look that threatened her with insult. But the age of chivalry is gone; that of sophisters, economists, and calculators has succeeded."
Johnson, incidentally, in spite of his own genius and his admiration of Burke, thought that "Whoever wishes to attain an English style, familiar but not coarse, and elegant but not ostentatious, must give his days and nights to the volumes of Addison".